|

There
was an amazing turnout for the May 23rd Sewer Feasibility Study
meeting. About 130 owners attended, and the Clubhouse was bursting
with people filling 104 seats, observing through the windows,
watching the video feed in the back room and hanging out in
the kitchen where the food was. After the presentation, a straw
vote was taken and a majority of those voting indicated they
were in favor of proceeding. Additionally, many called and emailed
their support of the proposed sewer project. Some of our good
friends and neighbors are opposed, and their concerns are genuine.
Many are still in information gathering mode before deciding.
What follows outlines the continually developing information
about how a sewer would actually happen in our mountain neighborhood.
The
presentation was made by Dietrich Stroeh, of CSW/Stuber Stroeh,
whom the MWPCA commissioned to do the Feasibility Study covering
our entire mountain neighborhood. The study defined six sub-areas,
each on a different watershed. Sewer lines would end up at different
places at the bottom of the hill. The entire study and other
information is available online at: http://mounttam.org The
MWPCA sewer committee objective is information gathering. They
have already met with Steve Kinsey and he is going to advocate
with Marin County Public Works and the two Public Sanitary Districts
on behalf of our neighborhood.
What
Are The Next Steps?
There are two steps on a neighborhood level: One is for
several people in each area to volunteer to become captains/lieutenants/worker
bees in their Study areas. The larger the area, the more needed.
Each neighborhood group needs to come together, have meetings,
reach out to those who aren't yet informed, and determine just
who wants to proceed now, who wants to proceed later and who
wants out entirely. Our fervent wish is to reach out to everyone
and work out a plan that acknowledges every opinion and accommodates
as many as possible.
Seed money will have to be raised. The second step is
to form a study group to determine how the overall project will
be financed and managed.
What
we will do soon: Right now, we are networking for volunteers
for each of the six defined areas. A study group will be formed
to examine the financial and management alternatives, come up
with a recommendation, and proceed.
We have updated the parcel lists that were on the wall at the
meeting and posted them on the website. Please check and review.
This is also a developing process, and if you think your property
should be designated in another area, that may be correct. The
best way for your ideas to be considered is for you to participate
. This is your wake-up call to become involved. Call/email us.
We will be thrilled to include you. Call 381-3119 or email webmaster@mounttam.org.
We will send out another informational letter to the owners-at-large
soon. It will cost about $300, paid for with the donations many
of you have made over the last several years to the sewer committee.
For developing updates we will need to send out communications
by email for cost reasons. And, of course, there will be updates
on the website. If you are not getting emails from webmaster@mounttam.org,
please give us your email address. Group emails to the neighborhood
include reminders of events, bus schedule changes, important
warnings and neighborhood issues such as this. You will not
be inundated, and all large group emails are sent out masked
- which means that only the webmaster has your email. This
is your neighborhood; be informed!
Management
A
Sewer Maintenance District, a separate legal entity from the
MWPCA, must be formed for the areas - we hope all - wanting
to proceed. The County would run it and appoint a local advisory
board. The Muir Woods park Sewer Maintenance District (MWPSMD)
would make arrangements to build the sewer system which would
connect to the Homestead Valley Public Sanitation District (HVPSD)
and the Mill Valley Public Sanitation District. The would arrange
for treatment rights to use the Mill Valley Treatment Plant
and contract for maintenance, operation and administration of
the facilities and District.
A sewer maintenance district is a simpler organization than
a Public Sanitation District. There are six public sanitation
districts that purchase treatment rights to the Mill Valley
treatment facility located across from the Middle School. Our
proposed pipes from the Sequoia Valley, Madera, Ridge and Chanticleer
areas would feed into Homestead Valley Public Sanitation District,
and pipes from the Washington Park and upper Edgewood areas
would feed into Mill Valley Public Sanitation District.
Boundaries
If
one or more of the identified areas wants to opt out entirely,
new boundaries can be drawn. If special planning and restrictions
are desired in any micro - area, this is the time.
What
is it all going to cost?
The
construction estimate for the entire neighborhood was about
$6,000,000. There would be another $1,000,000 in engineering
and legal fees and costs to set up the sewer governing body,
for an estimated total capital cost of $7,000,000. The county
may bear a small part of this to get the district going, and
it is possible that state funds might be secured in the form
of a low interest government loan. The capital construction
component would bring a sewer line to within connection distance
of each participating property. It would be each owner's responsibility
to actually connect to the new sewer pipe, at a cost that could
range from $2,000 to $5,000 for most properties depending on
how close you are, what lies between, and any special obstacles.
Look at the Study map and find your location, find the nearest
proposed sewer line, go outside and walk around and think about
how close you are and what obstacles exist. When completed,
each owner would also pay a connection fee to the sewer district.
For long established Public Sanitation Districts these are $3,000
- $5,000 to add a NEW home. There would be annual sewer fees
for maintenance and treatment rights, billed on your property
tax statement, which range from about $250 to $800 per year
in Southern Marin sanitation districts. We understand it is
not necessary to dig out your old system and dispose of it.
We also caution that this information is preliminary.
Natural
questions are:
How
would the $7,000,000 in capital costs be paid for, who would
participate and is non-participation an option? There are two
basic courses of action.
1.
Participation by Choice
With
this model, very simply stated, those properties who want to
participate would opt in; the overall cost would be divided
up between them. To give an example: If 250 owners choose to
opt in, dividing $7,000,000 by 250, each owner would pay $28,000
all at once to cover the initial capital cost. Owners could
of course, borrow the money against credit lines or create a
mortgage. If more opt in, the cost per property goes down, If
less opt in, the cost goes up. The actual costs may be adjusted
between the six identified areas, and issues of unimproved lots,
two lots with one house, and so forth will be investigated.
A method will be developed to reimburse the owners of the original
participating properties with the fees paid by those opting
in later. Those opting in later would pay more, according to
a predetermined scale.
2. Assessment
An
assessment is similar to the school bonds you presently pay.
All properties within the specified boundaries would participate.
The assessment is approved by vote, the bonds are bought, and
everyone pays the debt back over 20 to 30 years. Two (of many)
illustrative approaches are:
Per Parcel:
One
is for every owner to get one vote per parcel. If approved,
owners are assessed an equal amount per parcel. This model has
obvious issues with those already on sewer, those with far larger/smaller
homes than others, those with expensive, recent septic systems
and owners of unimproved or unbuildable lots.
Special Benefit:
The
second assessment model is to hire engineers to determine the
special benefit each lot would receive when the sewer goes in.
There is a process for this with room for discussion/appeal
and so forth. Those already on sewer or with unbuildable lots
would have minimal special benefit. Properties with large relative
value would have greater special benefit than the average single-family
house. The weight would confer greater voting power on some
properties, but it would also confer proportionally greater
capital costs. The range in cost could be large. Whether per
parcel or special benefit, the average homeowner would pay (very
roughly) something like $1,500 annually over 20-30 years to
retire the bond, in addition to the other annual costs for maintenance
and treatment. This would be billed on your property tax statement.

Why
Get Sewer?
-
To avoid the costs of repairing or replacing existing septic
systems.
Most of us have antiquated septic tanks and leach lines. If
you wish up get a permit to improve your home, you will probably
be forced to upgrade or replace your system. In 2000, California
passed Assembly Bill 885 which mandates biennial inspections
of septic installations. The requirements were too stringent,
the bill impractical to enforce and it has languished. The
state has been working on this, and information we have indicates
that within a year or two these inspections will commence.
If a system is found to be in violation, repairs in the $10,000
- $20,000 range would be common and replacement systems could
cost up to $60,000 or more. Furthermore, this type of septic
repair may be required every 15 years or so
- To
solve the sewage problem once and for all.
Once a property is on sewer, annual maintenance is built into
the annual fee, and maintenance should be minimal during the
early decades of a new sewer system.
- To
increase property values,
which would likely immediately rise over and above your cost
for the sewer system, and overall, properties would be easier
to sell.
- To
reduce the health hazard of substandard septic systems.
Mosquitoes, for example, commonly breed in antiquated septic
tanks.
Why
Not Get Sewer?
- To
avoid or delay paying the cost of the sewer system. Your
septic system may be working fine right now, especially if
you have recently paid for an expensive upgrade. Paying in
the next year or two for a sewer system you may not need for
many years is a substantial cost and may be burdensome.
- To
prevent others from making improvements and increasing the
size to their existing homes.
- To
prevent others from building on their unimproved property.
- This
may bring about change in the look and character of our community.
Few
people look forward to larger or more houses being built near
them. Regards 2 and 3, we are doing a study to discover an approximate
number of buildable lots in our area. Many of the unimproved lots
are not buildable for strong reasons other than septic issues |